Friday, April 18, 2008

I was planning on running this note next Tuesday, after the awards ceremony dinner on Monday. But as Ugly Duckling Presse has already posted a notice on its website & sent an email to its list, I’m running it today.
Here is my statement, as it will appear in the awards ceremony program on Monday, April 21st, giving the William Carlos Williams Award to Aram Saroyan for Complete Minimal Poems from Ugly Duckling Presse of Brooklyn:
The world was not ready when William Carlos Williams first published Kora in Hell in 1920 and the complete version of Spring & All three years later. Those books had a profound impact on American writing, even though they languished out of print for decades until they were brought back by City Lights in 1957 and Frontier Press in 1970. Aram Saroyan's minimal poems were even more of a scandal when they first appeared in the 1960s, foretelling not one, but several of the directions that American poetry would take in their wake, even as they too went out of print and stayed that way for over thirty years until Ugly Duckling Presse of Brooklyn seized the opportunity to make them available again. Like all miniaturists, Aram Saroyan uses the poem as a giant magnifying glass on the language of our lives and the processes we use to understand this. A work like "Blod" - that's the entire text - calls up not merely the words blood and bod, but all the sexuality that truncated latter term conveys, refusing to settle on one side or the other. Reading Complete Minimal Poems, we are struck by just how sturdy these poems have proven to be and just how brightly Saroyan's sense of humor shines through these pages. These poems are works of great optimism, and are as radical and strong in 2008 as the day they were written.
As I noted when I submitted this to the folks at the PSA, I think that the William Carlos Williams Award is the perfect prize for this book, and that this book is the perfect selection for this prize. The synergies just don’t get any better.
Here is a poem from the book that I recommended also be included in the awards ceremony program:

That borders on being visual poetry, as do a number of works in this extraordinary book. I wondered at the time if a visual poem had ever been included in a PSA program before. And I wonder even now if readers will recognize the ways in which this very brief poem engages the oldest of literary devices, rhyme. One of the things I like about it is the way it makes clear that visual poetry & “poetry” are not entirely separate genres. Other poems here echo the shorter works of Louis Zukofsky:
Not a
cricket
ticks a
clock
Nor am I imagining the connection. There is at least one work in this volume explicitly dedicated to “L.Z..” One thing this larger collection really accomplishes is to spell out just how rich & various Saroyan’s different strategies were with such a densely compact canvas.
Complete Minimal Poems contains the work from three books that appeared between 1968 & 1971, two of them from Random House. A fourth section appeared as part of the
As a result, Saroyan took the heat for an awful lot of writing that would come after, which could not have been fun. By the early 1970s, he’d done what he wanted with this form & moved on. But these works stand on their own almost shockingly well. Since I’ve never met him (I suppose it’s conceivable that we’ve been at the same event at some point, tho I’m not aware of it) I’ve never had the opportunity to thank him for opening up the landscape so broadly. I was only one of dozens & dozens of poets who benefited from these poems. The William Carlos Williams Award seems like the perfect opportunity to note just how important these poems have been.
Labels: Aram Saroyan, PSA
I never expected a book I've already read (and reviewed) to receive this prize. Or a collected poems, which this is after a fashion. But the book more than holds up after all this time, and even I hadn't managed to collect all the volumes of poetry that made up this book before this UDP book came out. So the book was necessary, and the prize is a nice surprise.
Geof
thanks... terrific pick..
and that "M" !!!!
title of John Cage's
Writings '67-'72 is
M
you've "single handdedly" with your choice
wet my appetite
The Poetry Society of Virginia is so rampamtly conservative, they withdrew from the PSA a few years ago- only two of us on the executive committee voted against doing so- I think I'll buy a few of these books and pass them around just to stir up a little chatter.
Good choice!!
Yeah, the MM looks great, did you have a second and third choice to share? Kyger, you mentioned a few days ago as a finalist if the book had been included for competition. I wish that it had. I mean "Blod" is not a great poem, how bout “lok”, does that make you think of sex also, or anything?
I mean, seriously
I think William Carlos Williams is going to want to talk to you in the Bardo. Bring your Kora, he's going to want to see that also.
Gary Parrish
I saw a bunch of their books in a beautiful display up in the Bibliobarn, a very large used bookstore up in S. Kortright, near to where I reside.
They must be locals or something.
At any rate, contratulations to Aram Saroyan! I really like this choice.
i wish you would have chosen a book by a poet who is still in action.
However, while three decades old, the poems are still fresh.
And the book included a small bunch never before published, and thus new to the eyes of most readers.
And wards are not unknown for selected and collected poems; in fact, it's fairly common.
Here's Clark Coolidge, in the lecture published in Talking Poetics
"I was once in Cambridge with Aram Saroyan who some of you may know of, who at that time was writing one-word poems. He would sit and smoke some dope and type one word and sit and look at it for hours and take it out and type it again. Originally they were words like "oxygen" and then one day the word "leukemia" appeared . . . ."
Also, not to quibble, but rhyme is not the oldest literary device -- whatever that means. Or, at least, we have texts we call literature and texts we call poems that predate rhyme (which starts in the 10th c BC in China and doesn't get introduced into Europe until the Middle Ages) -- at least as rhyme is usually understood, but of course you're maybe using an expanded definition of rhyme here (but then, why?).
YOU YET AROUND!
add to "that" those poets/artists who just "dropped out" for decades then returned to find....that
their kids are 30, their house is paid for, they
live on monthly SS check , they have health insurance (Medicare)...
and are still ( for the real "what-it's-worth)
producing
I am r=e=a=l=l=y looking forward to Aram's book... as only thing I know of his is that interview he did in magazine I was also in.. Coldspring Journal.. 1974 in-which he interviewed Rod McKuen ...
So he's still shepherding the poems, and he's also writing plays that are getting produced.
His dad had staying power. Why shouldn't the son?
What would be the difference if the poems were written in 40 BC, if they are still good, and if it's a book that's been published this year?
He is not really even that old of a man, so one need not also assume that his poetic output has ceased.
Fantastic choice!
As a side note: Cinco Puntos was looking forward to submitting Harvey Goldner's THE RESURRECTION OF BERT RINGOLD for the next year's consideration. Harvey's the guy who first turned me onto WCW back in the late 1950s. He would have liked at least to lurk in the shadows for some kind of news. But it turns out that the winner can't be dead. Poor Harvey died July 2007 before we finished putting the book to bed. Now Harvey's pissed. He didn't want to be dead.
I told him, "Harvey, it is what it is."
"No, it's not, damnit! I should know, huh?"
--Bob Grumman
<< Home

