Wednesday, December 07, 2005

An image set by Ray DiPalma
from the East Village Other
The new Chicago Review is out, continuing its recent run of issues so first-rate that you can’t believe the journal has any connection to a school. My understanding is that in recent years at least that relationship may have largely been one of benign neglect, but in this instance that has proven to be an incredibly good strategy. The issue has several of my favorite writers on the planet – C.D. Wright (with a 30-page poem!), Alan Bernheimer, Arkadii Dragomoshchenko, Merrill Gilfillan, Devin Johnston, Peter O’Leary & Paul Hoover are all people one should read as much of as one can get one’s hands on. Important island folk such as Geraldine Monk, Peter Larkin and Medbh McGuckian can be found here as well.
But the contribution that makes me happiest, at least on first reading, is a lovely six-page work, “After Midnight,” written by Ray DiPalma & dedicated to Gilfillan (whose own poems follow immediately thereafter). DiPalma is another poet who deserves to have a honking huge selected or collected poems out, bringing together work from his 30+ previous books, and making evident even to the most dunder-headed what an important figure he is, and has been, now for some 35 or so years. The book as I imagine it would have to be at least 400 pages to give even a decent hint of everything DiPalma has written.
In recent years, DiPalma has given as much energy to his visual art works – he has pieces, often involving stamp work and collage, in the collections of the Museum of Modern Art, the Getty, and the Art Institute of Chicago, among others – and to his teaching at the School for Visual Arts in New York, as he has to promoting his poetry. In fact, I know a number of younger writers around
When I was teaching that same class at SF State in 1981 I mentioned on Monday, one of the interesting aspects of the course was that, for almost every one of the 16 writers we covered during the term, there was at least one student who was willing to stand up and argue militantly against their writing – Bob Perelman was “too slick,” so was Michael Palmer, Hannah Weiners’ journals were an attempt to “cover up that she couldn’t write,” and so on. In fact, there was only one poet whom everyone in the class liked – Ray DiPalma. (The text we read, Planh, is excerpted in In the American Tree.) I remember being struck by that at the time – the fact that I can recall it 24 years hence suggests just how deeply the impression imprinted – because there’s nothing about DiPalma’s work that’s particularly easy – he often presents surfaces as elegant as anything you will find in Palmer or Perelman, but often more densely, without the scenic backdrops that are hinted at in Palmer’s work, or the underlying thematic engines that motivate Perelman’s.
“After Midnight” – the name just happens to be that of a rubber stamp products company – reads on the page like a single text, at least until you realize that it is a series of ten sonnets, composed of self-contained free verse couplets with longish lines that read more like a ghazal:
Without a fixed designation, as a matter of form,
bargaining notations, mnemonic targets, omertà
A third signature, distraction’s forward gaze,
pale abbreviations, the limits of a compass turn
Assertion is within the exclusion and without the inclusion,
I can remember neither the lament it prompted nor its novelty
There are no false alarms, no after effects honorably offered,
no obscure etymologies, arias, no discernible debt
A typefont peculiar to negotiations, constant measurement,
a block of salt, spilled shapes, blank inlays, a German wife
Rain shadows, red seeds, the heft of blue serge,
no want to material display, the game continues
Misled by thought, refractive, invisible commotion, eye for one,
only panorama, muled from place to place, interrogated
That is the third of the ten sections or sonnets here & while I chose it as “most typical,” the whole idea is a misnomer – there’s a tonal development that starts at the poem’s very beginning – all seven couplets of the first section are lists –
Partially filled notebooks, a stopwatch,
green candles, a Chinese screen, knives and forks
– but not, as you can see, obvious ones. The last sonnet shuts with a ring of closure as sharply etched as the old “Mark VII” production company logo at the end of an episode of Dragnet. Yet between points A & B, does anything really “happen?”
That’s the wrong question to ask, of course, because the answer will always be both yes & no. No in the sense of the traditional trappings of narrative discourse, but Yes in that the richness of text pulls one in instantly & moves one along – one is reluctant to have the work end. DiPalma is a master of textual surfaces – one could read him for that aspect of his work alone & learn an enormous number of useful lessons.
Because DiPalma has been published almost entirely by small presses throughout his career, it’s difficult for anyone but the most dedicated fan to get a sense of the reach of his overall project. His poems are not nearly so much objects as they are environments, lush worlds, sensual & crowded. You enter them & can wander endlessly – tho in fact his scale is mostly, as here, quite contained. It’s a world we should all visit often.
And so it is to be watched"
This is from Di Palma's "Hotel Des Ruines," something I came across by accident about ten years ago while house sitting in Philadelphia. I've never been a big fan of the American Poetry Review, but Di Palma had eight of these poems in the issue, and they were SO startling, SO beautiful, I considered stealing the issue of APR. Instead I went to the store, since it was the latest issue at the time.
These eight poems were written via fax machine with an artist whose name escapes me. But Di Palma shakes us, one reader at a time, and I really WISH it was poetry like HIS that be taught to high school kids instead of Sharon Olds, or whoever they're being fed.
Gilfillan had this FANTASTIC book I bought (maybe the last retail copy in the world?) at Gotham Bookmart when I was nineteen or twenty. The poems were odd, which excited me, as any poems being different at the time excited me. But what really sold the book (have to admit) was the picture of Gilfillan out in the desert (?) with a giant yucca plant (?) looking sexy (!) and the words, "This is a dynamite book" at the bottom. Wow, any man who can say his book is dynamite and mean it, and actually have the poems to back it up is getting me to the cashier!
Are there any poets as hot and cool as Gilfillan these days? I've been LOOKING DAMMIT!
CAConrad
p.s. Gotham Bookmart STILL has books of poetry on the shelf from the 70s. I bought (HAS to be the last retail copy on Earth!) Theodore Enslin's chapbook FEVER POEMS for $1.
http://PhillySound.blogspot.com
Jessica
THE PEOPLE OUT ON THE LAGOON
Mr Zeuch and his wife Mustafabelle
The Quinzies and the Pargs
Lord and Lady Foote-Smythe
The Baallgs and their daughters
Margareet and Gritae Baallg-Syffert
The Rhuele twins Hoost and Byle
And their cousins Leff and Lugre Wettewin
The Right Reverend Elvira Klaww and her niece
Benedicta Fustus-Jowle and nephew Clarus Minor
The Hunderts and Pilchrings
The Crashelberies and their maid Vinta
The Hyes and the current ambassador
To The Sijille Isles Protectorate Hank Loomish
The Marquesa Niftt with her dog Yel
The Mittagessens from Greensburgh
And their friends Thalassa and Yufik Tythe
Piol Dewsquil the former heavyweight champion
The Rabbi Uen Vy-Vdeuin and his son Noakes
Herr Doktor Brueler Hencken und Frau Brueler
Ytre Ahl the architecht of Podz
The Notheliers and the Ghuushtzies Khaa and Lill
Mr and Mrs Hasch-Heft and their chauffeur Gristikh
Pongo the swordswallower
The erstwhile Jesuit Winterts Rainwind and his now wife
Fifi Woden the ballerina
-- Ray DiPalma
The function of names, here without anything to fill them out.
The contexts this reminds one of (a gossip column, for instance: "In attendance were..."). This makes it even funnier.
The pure sonic delights of the particular names invented or chosen.
there's a scene in Amadeus where Salieri picks up Mozart manuscripts and looks in shocked awe (tinged with divine terror) at the neat and tidy notes on the page; on the soundtrack each of the pieces is heard (as if by magic). this element of "hearing" the DiPalma manuscript by simply looking at it presents itself clearly (almost like "understanding the poem by looking at it: simply. Impressed.
I've never heard of or read DiPalma before today (thanks Ron!) & wow. what a gift.
(--Ashbery's Into the Dusk Charge Air comes to mind in relation to this poem as well as the history of the Anglo-Saxon language chapter in Joyce's Ulysses -- Oxen of the Sun-- great company -- I'd mention The Katzenjammer Kids but that's a whole nother story)
The poem reminds me of a lesser version of "Cry, Baby, Cry" by the Beatles, a song which features people with funny names who do stuff. I do not buy the irrelevance of stories. And us knowing that these people are 'out on the lagoon' does not a story make.
And Wietor: don't be smug. You don't think these are relevant questions? You only come across as inarticulate. Screw magic: tell me how you manage to see the functionlessness of these names as a poetic virtue rather than as an indicator of something that is not actually art.
The Lagoon poem is quite the little impressionistic piece....all water lillies and pointalistic fantasies. Well done.
Must we have that conversation about whether something qualifies as art or not? Again?
Of course it's art. Why else would somebody do it?
A: My kid could do that.
B: But she didn't.
OR
A: My kid could do that.
B: And she did, but you said, "Why are you doing that?," and she replaced her delight with the ambition to become an investment banker, which career she then abandoned to cook Chef Boyardee for her husband for the rest of her regretful life.
But to expand a little further on what I like about the DiPalma:
Actually, "different things," though vague, was meant to be jokey, but also to point out the simplicity this poem allows. It sets out the various functions of language I mentioned in crisp ways, and allows them to interact in what is definitely, indubitably, unerasably, an aesthetic experience, albeit one which you don't like.
The catalog of names brings to mind the vision of a parade of ghosts. It's very romantic, especially given that they're all "out on the lagoon." Ghostly shapes on the waters. Very British, and almost classic in that sense.
Your cynical proposal about the phone book is nonsense. Do it, okay? Then compare the results. If you don't see the difference, I'll allow that it may be a matter of taste rather than brutal lack of care... really. But why such hostility? What threatens you here?
I must admit that, though I've read Ulysses three times, the "Oxen of the Sun" chapter is the one I've never read all the way through. I find it dreadfully boring and taxing. If only it had the economy of DiPalma. But I guess the entire English language is a bit too big for that.
exhaustedly yours,
Andy
I believe I first heard this 'accusation' referenced by Peter Gizzi in his _Exact Change_ interview with Palmer well over a decade ago.
But I cannot as of yet entrance this into useful discussion.
I was reminded of this yesterday again, when I noticed RS discussing the 'oedepial moment' Duncan may have confronted, or not confronted when yelling at Barrett Watten after he Watten, used an 'in-opportune' analogy to Zukofsky (Ron has mentioned this before, but I see this is mentioned again in _Under 'Albany_).
I would however suggest that rather then force the issue here, I'll need to save my 'ballistic' 'flapping' for the more opportune forum of an well-constructed essay or 'a'-poetics 'manifesto' of sorts.
'Elegance' is an awe-ful/ly convenient word to use in its broadest strokes.
As Curtis Faville reminds us, and I paraphrase perhaps, "Come on people isn't this self-evident?"
So then, why wouldn't it be?
What are we forgetting? Alas, "I distract windows"...
I just read these things - such as di Palma's naming poem above
- sure I see connections -but it's the same delight I got as a child reading Edward Lear -and "nonsense" is never non sense - there is a point where you do indeed "go over into" magic -this is not to say di Palma isn't telling us something profound (or not) -or that he is a 'great' poet or that you or another couldn't do the same with a phone book - in fact - I like that idea -look at what Kenneth Goldsmith does - or did - by re-writing the NY Times verbatim ! Art and literature can't be pinned down to logical statements of "meaningfulness" -sure there are structures, and there is always meaning, however that is defined, (as well as 'magic') -or there is meaning in magic and magic in meaning - but one needs to be able to sense and read in certain 'open' way...but, also, everyone sees different things. (Some language poetry for example, I feel I could and in fact I know (or think I know that I know!) I could do as well as the writers -but it can be deceptive this writing business..)
I should have been clearer regarding the Joyce, Oxen of the Sun reference: I've only been able to "understand/appreciate" Joyce in the Listening. Naxos AudioBooks has a 22 CD set of Jim Norton/with Marcella Riordan reading the entire book (to perfection) -- Listening to the Oxen of the Sun chapter is, to use the oft used term: Musical.
Anonymous is axe-grinding. Pay no heed.
i'm not trying to be difficult. people often use this type of expression but seldom explain it....
steve in taipei
ps [hey p francis, nice pic, do you ever come to taipei? [smile
in response to your statement that "Also, I've, y'know, never seen a poem that's just a list of funny names like this," check out the following by clark coolidge -- of whom dipalma once wrote: "in the poetry of clark coolidge, fulgence is dugle" (dipalma's contribution to the stations symposium on coolidge that ron edited back in the 1970s).
"Collected Names"
http://epc.buffalo.edu/authors/coolidge/uncoll1.html
"Drummers" (for Larry Fagin)
http://epc.buffalo.edu/authors/coolidge/uncoll3.html
one consists of real names, the other of made-up ones. interesting to compare...
enjoy,
tom orange
<< Home


